George
Orwell was a writer who dealt
with political issues and criticized undesirable form of governments in his
novels, mostly in relation to the ones that existed at that time. ‘Why I Write’
is his autobiographical essay, which is mainly about answering two questions: ‘why’
and ‘how’ he writes.
Orwell
recognizes that in nature, he would have been writing purple passages
-sentences or expressions without specific meaning but rhetorical purpose only-
and artistic, beautiful books without any political purposes. However, as he
was living in the time when totalitarianism was hitting its peak, international
relationships were worsening every day, and World War II was about to take place, he felt responsibility to reveal
the truth against the wrongs –especially political ones- done around the world.
In short, he implies that he writes in order to let the general public
acknowledge political injustice.
In
the last paragraph, Orwell states how prose should be written (and how he tries
to write), metaphorically, that “Good prose is like a windowpane.” Windowpanes
are made up of glass and windowsills. Glass is transparent, symbolizing the
place we see the world through. Windowsills are the ones that judge where the
glasses will be placed. As writer’s political aspects differ from each others’,
the windowsills will be placed differently. If all prose is like a
windowpane, the readers will be able to see the world in diverse aspects from
different angles. Therefore, the people will be able to remain objective,
decide right or wrong themselves and eventually find out the injustice in the
politics.
This
piece of writing is a mixture of several different genres. First, this writing
is an autobiographical essay. As the author writes about himself and his own
thoughts, this essay is surely being autobiographical and expository. While in
novels, authors must stand behind characters to convey messages and thoughts, usually in indirect ways, Orwell was enabled to write down his
thoughts on why and how he writes freely and directly.
Second,
this essay is being persuasive, since the author is giving out his opinion on
which kind of prose is good. Since he is not being argumentative or
against something, it is not a typical persuasive essay, but he is at least arguing
that prose should never be lifeless but like a windowpane.
Poetry
also comprises this writing. There is a poem in the middle of the essay,
written by Orwell, which shows his struggle between writing style of his
nature and style which the world wants him to write. The poem is being
effective in conveying his struggle within short, symbolic words. Through this,
readers could clearly see the reason why he writes right now. It also makes
readers feel fresh to read poem inside a prose.
Orwell
is being very dry and simple with his sentences in this essay. He tries to use
rhetorical expressions or metaphors less as he writes. This makes the sentences
look clean and clear, which helps him to convey exactly what he wants to. Being
straightforward in meaning also shows that we are in emergency(when international
tension has elevated) that we can’t be vague or misleading with our words.
Simple
and clear sentences also let the whole essay be definitive. As people read
this, they will feel that the writer is very confident and has no doubt on
whatever he is writing about. This helps the essay to be more persuasive as he
argues about how prose should be written.
Plus,
this might be related to the fact that Orwell is viewing ‘purple passages’
negatively in this essay. In his young days, he once admired the literary value
of those and wanted to be writing those later as they were producing joy and
pleasure, making the sound rhythmical. However, he says they are ‘lifeless’ in
the end since they are not helping the readers to see the world through a
windowpane that the writers have made.
George
Orwell’s essay ‘Why I Write’ is definitely a well-written essay as its genres;
autobiographical, expository, persuasive and poetry; and its writing style,
being dry and simple, benefit the intensity and delivery of the main points
positively and effectively.
0 개의 댓글:
댓글 쓰기